By Markus Skårnes
My
practice group consisted of me, Marikken and Vegard. We were teaching
in seventh grade. We were all involved pretty much equally both in
planning and teaching the lesson. We were introduced to the concept
of grammar to go, which teaches us to not teach grammar as a separate
unit, but rather in the context of the language. This can be done by
working with a text over a period of time. The pupils will preferably
learn the text by heart as well as learn the grammatical structure,
literary devices and vocabulary that the text uses. By knowing the
text, they will hopefully remember all of the things they learn. The
advantage of this is that you get to see grammar as a natural part of
the English language instead of just an additional thing you have to
learn.
Enter,
stranger, but take heed
Of
what awaits the sin of greed,
For
those who take, but do not earn,
Must
pay most dearly in their turn.
So
if you seek beneath our floors
A
treasure that was never yours,
Thief,
you have been warned, beware
Of
finding more than treasure there.
In
the book it is the warning that can be read when you walk in to
Gringotts, the wizarding bank. We decided to use this because it
relates to the fantasy project we worked on for the entirety of our
practice period.
Our
plan for working with it was as follows: First we show the pupils a
video that we made, showcasing Gringotts and the dangers within. This
was to both give visual context to the poem, thereby making it easier
to understand for the pupils, and also to start the class off with
something fun. After handing out the poem as well as the worksheets,
we then read the poem out loud for the pupils and go through
difficult or strange words to expand their vocabulary and to make
sure they understand what the poem means. Following this, we planned
to go through all of the pronunciations that might be tricky for
learners of English. This was to be done by first saying the word in
question and then having the pupils repeat it back a few times.
Moving
on to grammar, we wanted to focus on two word classes. We therefore
made one table with three columns for verbs (infinitive, present
tense and past tense) and another with two columns for nouns
(singular and plural). After a short repetition about word classes,
the pupils were to work with this for most of the lesson.
At
the end we planned to have the pupils sit in pairs and read alternate
lines of the poem out loud to each other.
When
the lesson came, it started with a missing video. All was well in the
end, as Vegard was able to fetch the video quickly while we talked
about the picture of the goblin above the poem on the paper which the
pupils had. After that, everything went smoothly until we noticed
that we did not have enough time for the pupils to read the poem out
loud. We decided to skip that part instead of rushing through it at
the end, to give the pupils more time to work on the grammar part.
Due
to the limited time frame we had, we could not have the pupils
memorize the text, thus losing out on part of the point of grammar to
go. We could have worked with it for a longer period of time, but we
felt it was more important to get the fantasy project done.
When
reflecting on the lesson and our plan we realized that we had bitten
over more than we could chew. I think instead of doing both verbs and
nouns, we should have focused on one of them. That way, we could have
explained it more thoroughly and the pupils would get the feeling
that they are mastering the concept. One of the reasons we felt it
would have been beneficial to focus on only one word class is the
fact that there were some difficult and possibly confusing words.
There were abstract nouns, like “greed”. There were also words
that could be nouns of verbs depending on the context, such as “turn”
and “heed”. We could probably have spent an entire lesson just on
words that can be several word classes. The word “heed” was
especially confusing, as it is a verb most of the time, but in this
particular context is a noun due to the word “take” in front of
it.
Despite
this, the pupils still learned a good bit from the poem and overall
the method worked well for just one lesson. In one lesson we touched
upon vocabulary, pronunciations, word classes and expanding on their
knowledge of fantasy literature. If we had more time, we could have
done words that are both nouns and verbs, abstract nouns, rhyme
scheme and even creative writing based on the text.
Well-presented post about your teaching scheme and your own reflection/evaluation of the lesson. The introduction part is especially very informative by summarizing the gist of the "grammar-to-go" method. The choice of the text was also very clever in considering the relevance to the fantasy project you guys were doing. Yes, as you have pointed out, it was probably too ambitious to try to cover too many grammar points in one lesson, but what´s more important is to learn from your mistakes. :) Good job!
ReplyDelete